30.08.2016, 22:14
Externer Inhalt (z.B. Newsletter, E-Mails, Seiteninhalte):Auf der firmeneigenen Seite https://recyclix.com/paymentPolicy/ findet sich die Formulierung
Recyclix Sp.z o.o may merge these funds with the funds of other Users and its proprietary funds. These merged funds may be used for payments to other Users or for the sake of our mutual corporate aims or otherwise. However, Recyclix Sp.z o.o. shall in any case pay or return you the funds according to this Payment Policy and the Terms of Use.
ReCyclix zahlt also mit dem eingesammelten Kapital ggfs. andere „User“ aus. Das ist ein klassisches Schneeball- System oder Ponzi-Schema.
recyclix: I agree that perhaps we should revise this verbiage but let me explain what stands behind this.
First key to success is to have waste in stock for which funds are needs to buy it.
Once you have waste and you start recycling it you need to reach a certain volume before you can sell it.
Our users who have 500kg of waste in recycling will result in frustration of we will distribute profits to them when their granules are sold.
This would result in a 2 months term along with difference in payment plans which were designed with convenience for users.
Since all waste is mixed together and we don’t know which particular lot belongs to each user; same happens with cash flow – it goes into „recycling“ as well (waste purchase, equipment purchase and running costs)
I don’t see any wrong doing by paying for equipment that will be for Mutual use of Recyclix with funds used for equipment purchase online.
In fact we have paid 35,000€ this month for agglomerator purchase from users funds.
Die stellungnahme von recyclix zu diesem punkt der terms of use
